BC
Berry Corp (bry) (BRY)·Q1 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q1 2025 delivered a clean operational beat versus Wall Street on revenue, EPS, and EBITDA, while GAAP results were impacted by a non-cash impairment; FY25 guidance was reaffirmed and hedging remains robust. Revenue (ex-derivative gains) was $177.2M vs S&P Global consensus $165.5M*, Adjusted EPS was $0.12 vs $0.083*, and Adjusted EBITDA was $68.5M vs $64M* .
- Operational discipline: hedged LOE was $26.40/boe, 9% below FY25 midpoint; production of 24.7 Mboe/d (93% oil) was slightly lower QoQ due to planned downtime tied to thermal diatomite drilling .
- Balance sheet improved: liquidity rose to $120M, leverage ratio decreased to 1.37x; the Board declared a $0.03 dividend and the company repaid $11M of debt .
- Strategic catalysts: front-loaded California thermal diatomite program with >100% ROR at recent strip and first operated 4-well horizontal pad in Utah expected online in Q3 (August), positioning 2H volume and cash flow growth .
- Key near-term stock driver: continued execution in thermal diatomite and visibility on Uinta pad completions, with hedge protection (~73% of 2025 oil at ~$74.69 Brent) mitigating downside from commodity volatility .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Strong execution and reaffirmed guidance: “We are confident in our ability to navigate current market volatility and our 2025 outlook remains unchanged,” supported by cost improvements and strong hedge coverage .
- Thermal diatomite momentum: California program expanded (drilled 2x wells vs Q4) with project economics >100% ROR at current strip; permits in hand to execute the 2025 plan .
- Capital discipline and safety: Liquidity increased to $120M; leverage ratio improved to 1.37x; “0 recordable incidents, 0 lost time incidents and no reportable spills” in E&P operations .
What Went Wrong
- GAAP net loss driven by non-cash impairment: Recorded a pre-tax impairment of $158M ($113M after-tax) on a non-thermal diatomite California property, leading to GAAP diluted EPS of $(1.25) .
- Slight QoQ production decline to 24.7 Mboe/d due to planned downtime associated with drilling in thermal diatomite reservoirs (short-term headwind to volumes) .
- LOE increased QoQ on an unhedged basis ($25.74/boe unhedged vs $23.24 in Q4), though hedged LOE was managed to $26.40/boe and below guidance midpoint .
Financial Results
Core Financials vs Prior Periods
Results vs S&P Global Consensus (Q1 2025)
Values marked with * were retrieved from S&P Global.
Segment Breakdown
KPIs
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “Our cash flow is protected by our strong hedge position... We are confident in our ability to navigate current market volatility and our 2025 outlook remains unchanged.” – CEO Fernando Araujo .
- “We strengthened our balance sheet by paying down $11 million of debt and returned $2 million in cash to shareholders... liquidity increased to $120 million, and we improved our leverage ratio to 1.37x.” – CEO Fernando Araujo .
- “First quarter adjusted EBITDA was $68 million and operating cash flow was $46 million... total LOE per BOE was lower than our annual guidance as we optimize steam injection volumes while sustaining production.” – CFO Jeff Magids .
- “We had 0 recordable incidents, 0 lost time incidents and no reportable spills during the first quarter.” – President Danielle Hunter .
- “Economics of the thermal diatomite remain highly attractive... Most of these projects generate a rate of return in excess of 100%.” – CEO Fernando Araujo .
Q&A Highlights
- Thermal diatomite scalability: Inventory depth with ~125 thermal diatomite sidetracks categorized as PUDs and ~1,000 future locations; received ~45 sidetrack permits YTD, enabling ramp pending Kern County EIR decision .
- Uinta 4-well pad learnings and timeline: 3-mile laterals with 91% in-zone drilling; frac in June, clean-up and facility tie-ins, initial production expected late July with meaningful rates in August; cost savings of ~$90k per well by fueling rigs with produced gas .
- California operating advantages: Extensive sidetrack PUD inventory (~225 of ~500 PUDs at YE2024), basin familiarity, and >100% ROR projects underpin resilience and growth .
Estimates Context
- Q1 2025 beat across revenue, EPS, and EBITDA versus S&P Global consensus: Revenue $177.2M vs $165.5M*; Adjusted EPS $0.12 vs $0.0825*; Adjusted EBITDA $68.5M vs $64.0M* .
- FY25 consensus implies EPS ~$0.14* and EBITDA ~$232M*; hedge protection and 2H volume uplift from thermal diatomite and Uinta horizontals may support upward revisions to EBITDA if LOE stays below guidance and volumes trend up. Values marked with * were retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Operational beat masked by impairment: Adjusted metrics and cash generation were solid; GAAP loss driven by $158M pre-tax non-cash impairment on non-thermal diatomite property .
- Cost execution: Hedged LOE at $26.40/boe came in 9% below FY25 midpoint; adjusted G&A $7.19/boe; supports sustainable FCF at strip .
- Hedge-supported downside protection: ~73% of 2025 oil hedged at ~$74.69 Brent and
80% of 2025 gas purchases hedged ($4.24/MMBtu), reducing earnings volatility . - Near-term catalysts: Q3 timing for first operated Uinta pad; 2H uplift from front-loaded thermal diatomite program; watch August production updates .
- Balance sheet trajectory: Improved liquidity ($120M) and leverage ratio (1.37x); continued debt reduction and fixed dividend ($0.03) provide capital return visibility .
- Discrepancy to note: Press release Free Cash Flow of $17.5M vs CFO comment on $7M after working capital changes—investors should reconcile cash flow definitions and working capital impacts .
- Medium-term thesis: If regulatory tone in California continues improving and Uinta execution confirms type curves, BRY can compound FCF with low-capital-intensity projects, supported by robust hedges and improving leverage .
Values marked with * were retrieved from S&P Global.
Citations: